|
James Stabile Informational Newsletter |
June 2004 |
|
Welcome to James Stabile Informational Newsletter In this newsletter you will find monthly updates and editorials concerning the issues
of extreme importance and interest to the site's creator and owner James
Stabile. These issues include - Family, Entertainment, Health &
Fitness, Politics, Religion & Spiritualism and Tech Talk. Peruse the articles and if you desire,
send comments, questions or join our mailing list. Feel absolutely free to email
articles to include in the next month's edition.
As always do not feel obligated to participate. And thank you for this opportunity.
June
dates worth noting: |
|
June, can it be already. 2004 is almost 6 months old. Nearly half way through 2004. It's the best time of the year for me, summer vacation starts June 11. We go back to work next August 10 almost 2 weeks earlier than normal. Our county is adopting a new calendar. The change will be gradual, over the next two years. Next year we, staff, start work on August 10, students on Aug 16 till June 2. The next year, 2005-2006, we start August 2, students August 8 through May 25. This new schedule fits the calendar year with vacations coming at the end of semesters. The first semester will end at winter break. When we resume after the New Year the second semester will begin. Also, it aligns well with the college schedules, allowing newly graduating high school seniors to take advantage of starting college during the summer terms. I think the school board just wants to throw a monkey wrench in the summer schedules of staff and students. Many staff members work at summer jobs including summer camps. Many students go out of state to summer camps which will conflict with the new school year schedule. Oh well, that's progress? To me June always brings to mind, yes summer vacation, but more recently retirement. I plan to start my retirement January 2008, maybe 2009. It depends on my financial prospectus for my senior years. I will be retiring early, since I started my career in the state of Florida in 1984, but pay that no mind. By 2008 or possible 2009, I'll be in a financial position to end it all. No, not my life, just my job. My life will just be beginning. Trust me I won't retire a day before I'm financially able to do so. I want to enjoy my golden years. I don't want to cut corners or have to get a part time job. The hardest thing that I will have to do is leave my salary behind. In education, at least high school teaching, by the time you make a descent wage, relatively speaking, it's time to retire. But we have good vacations. As if you can eat vacations or pay your mortgage with vacations. For most of my career, almost 30 years, I've had two jobs and worked summer school. I'm ready to retire. I'm tired! God bless those overachievers who work 60 hours a week and well into their 60's or beyond, but I'm not one of those people. I'm definitely not a workaholic. Work is good, in perspective it is just the way one earns his or her money. It does not or should not define one's identity or worth. It looks like I will be coming home the week after the 4th of July, Thursday, July 8 through Tuesday, July 13. I should be in Sharon around 1:30 or 2:00 on the 8th of July. Leaving on a 9:05 a.m. flight from Pittsburgh on July 13. Hope to see everyone. |
|
Entertainment Did you see the finale of Friends? I liked the way it ended. Finally, after 10 years Rachel and Ross are together. They have been on again off again for years. The situation just wasn't right for them to be together. Something always complicated their relationship. It's fitting that in the last episode Ross and Rachel got it right are recognized that they loved each other. Supposedly they will be married and live happily ever after in TVLand. I wasn't a fan of the show from the start. I started watching it a few years ago. I think it was very funny. During the last episode I found myself laughing out loud. I can't name a favorite character. Each of the six characters is unique in his or her own way and equally funny. If I had to choose, it would be Phoebe. She is so funny, and she does it without trying. Joey will be the only spin-off show. It debuts in September on NBC. Reruns of Friends will be airing for years and years. Speaking of reruns, Sex and the City reruns will air on TBS starting June 15 (I think it's the 15th). The reruns will start from the beginning of the show's history. I haven't seen all of the episodes. During the five or six years that the show was on television, I didn't subscribe to HBO. Of course there was that short period of time at my former condo where direct TV, including the HBO channels, was free to everyone. The fee was included in the owner's monthly maintenance fee, but soon after I moved and I became one of the owners. And no more free HBO. Also, I would enjoy seeing Sex and the City at motels when I was on vacation. I doubt if I ever would get HBO or any extra pay channels at this point. I'm trying to reduce my monthly financial burden in order to retire. So, the frills are gone. Troy Good movie! A good review of ancient Greek mythology highlighting the Trojan war. I had forgotten my Greek mythology, but the movie stimulated my memory. I forgot what an influential role Helen of Troy had played in the Trojan war. The movie was long, about 2 hours and 45 minutes, but it moved at a fast pace. There were many battle and love scenes, terrific butt shots and some interesting bosom scenes. Brad Pitt had the staring role. He exposed his naked butt, too. He did an admirable job at both. The handsome English actor Orlando Bloom played Prince Paris, a cowardly prince who at the end of the movie finally came through as a courageous warrior. Diane Kruger played the beautiful Helen of Troy. A love story and a war story that could have taken place at many different times in history, this one just happened to take place at the time of the Trojan war. The human condition with all of it's emotions and feelings is explored with great success in this movie. Airing tonight on the History Channel is The True Story of Troy. Archeologists and historians are uncovering compelling evidence that the city of Troy and the Trojan War actually existed. It should be interesting. However, the TV Guide warns not to take anything that existed before recorded history as true. Fact or fiction politics existed in the time of ancient Greece. See the movie and find out how. The Day After Tomorrow I just saw this one on Patti's birthday. Not a great movie, but an interesting one. The movie has you going away with amazement and wonderment. Could this really happen? The movie is one of those disaster movies. Another Ice Age hits the world, due to global warmer and the irresponsible way we deal with our environmental problems. No, it probably won't happen like it did in the movie. Although, it is possible. If another Ice Age was to hit the earth, it would take much more time to evolve. Dennis Quaid reminded me a little of Brad Pitt in Troy, over acted. The young people in the movie, such as Jake Gyllenhaal, Dennis Quaid's son, made the movie. Sela Ward did a good job as Dennis Quaid's wife. An interesting movie and totally unbelievable movie. Two hours and 5 minutes, whew another long one. |
|
|
There have been great strides in stem cell research. I heard on the Miami TV news and read in the (Ft. Lauderdale) Sun-Sentinel that experimentation on lab rats has produced promising results. Lab rats that had been paralyzed have regained up to 70% use of their limbs after being treated with stem cell therapy. It’s been theorized that stem cells could be effective in the treatment of paralysis as well as Alzheimer and other diseases. Should stem cell research be accelerated? Well, that’s a tough question. Remember President Bush’s stem cell announcement in August of 2001? He walked the diplomatic line saying that government funded stem cell research would be limited to the stem cells that existed at that time, no new stem cells would be used for research. According to the news, the supply of stem cells is dwindling. Former first lady Nancy Reagan has sent a letter to President Bush begging him to rescind his orders on stem cell research. She has taken a very vocal, proactive stand on stem cell research. As it stands now the administration has become silent on the subject. This is not an easy issue to resolve. Sure, who wouldn’t want to help seriously ill people recover from their disease or at least make improvements, but there is a religious, moral side to the dilemma. The most viable, successful stem cells come from aborted embryos. How do we obtain these embryos? This does become a religious issue. The conservative right and the official Catholic Church stand is definitely against such research if it involves aborted embryos. According to these groups there is no “grey” area involving stem cells. No is no. But that is usually the position or authoritarian, self-righteous and self-proclaimed messenger’s of God. Compromise and the examination of individual situations are warranted to determine the question of such research. In my opinion this is not an issue for “government” or “politicians” to decide. If abortion is legal and it is, why not use the embryos that are a byproduct of abortion to be used for this research. They exist. Why waste this valuable link in the solving of many dreadful diseases? This is no easy decision. I can see the position of those who oppose abortion. This may inadvertently lead to the mass producing of human embryos for the expressed purpose of stem cell research. This can be likened to the use of body parts of people who have died. What are the rights of the donor? Should money be a function of the donation? Where does it end? It is easy to give one’s opinions concerning these dilemmas when one has nothing to lose or is not affected by the outcome. I don’t know the answers. I feel that we as a society must tackle these issues. We will never know the “right” answer. There may not be a “right” answer. We must have faith that we are approaching these issues with a sense of respect for all life. I just read in the paper this morning about the beneficial effects of aspirin and women. Supposedly, women who take a daily aspirin have 28% or 30% less chance of contracting breast cancer. So an aspirin a day is good for cancer as well as heart disease, in some cases. I wonder about these findings. I wonder about the scientific conditions of the study. Also, what other factors may be contributing to these findings. In any case, I still believe that a proactive approach to health is beneficial. Healthy eating, an active life, avoidance of the activities known to have ill affects on the body and a positive attitude makes good sense to me. |
|
|
Is President George W. Bush in political trouble? I think not. He is still very popular with the American people. He and the Republican party have not yet begun to fight, so to speak. I think he has or at least is working on a political plan to redirect the American voters perception of his latest political liability, namely the alleged abuse of the Iraqian prisoners. This supposed abuse is despicable. It is inexcusable. It is unethical and immoral. The investigation is just starting. I have a feeling that it will expand and develop into a major undertaking. I don't believe the situation is isolated. To me it seems that such behavior is reflective of the treatment of prisoners or detainees in Iraq, Afghanistan or any place such prisoners or detainees exits. It seems to reflect the attitude of this administration and current military leaders. It stems directly from the attitude of superiority and dominance that motivated our governmental leaders to unilaterally invade Iraq. This attitude started at the top of the chain of command both in the White House and in the military ranks. Success at all costs. That could be the motto of the Bush administration as well as the battle cry for this Iraqian invasion. The abuse is bad enough, but the manner in which the military leaders including the Secretary of War and the Commander In Chief dealt with the situation was abominable. Why is it so hard for the Bush administration to speak the truth? Why must the Bush administration try to control every aspect of American life? Why doesn't the Bush administration respect the intelligence and dignity of all Americans? Just be real. Once again the Bush political machine will use it's control, dominance and "spin" to make this situation "work" for the president's re-election attempt. If the president is successful, then the American people will be the losers. People, open your eyes. Don't bury your heads in the sand. Don't make rationalizations to explain the administration's meager attempts at governing this nation. Wake up, take inventory of the American situation and decide that enough is enough. What is Senator Kerry doing about this mess? Not much. As I've said before, Kerry is not my first choice for the role as the Democratic presidential nominee, but now he is our only hope. At least Senator Kerry would consider the working man and woman when making decisions affecting the fate of the American way of life. Kerry needs to get moving. He is a liberal. So be it. He is a Clinton Democrat, conservative on spending and liberal on social services issues. Be proud and firmly identify with that description Mr. Kerry. What's the media's role? It should be one of reporting the news. Today's media is too concerned about editorializing the news. We do not need to hear the media's so called experts' opinion on the day to day events whether it be the presidential campaign or the attack on Iraq. We are thinking people. After hearing the news of the day, the majority of Americans are quite capable of making wise decisions concerning their own attitudes concerning the campaign or Iraq. To me the written word, print media, the newspaper is the best source of getting the "news". I feel that I am able to get a more complete and objective reporting of the news from the daily newspaper than from any other media types. Television, especially cable news tends to dissect the news. We are capable of hearing the news and deciding for ourselves our feelings concerning the day's events. TV news people try to give their opinions. That's not reporting news. I really don't care how Tim Russert or Chris Matthews feels about a news event. I must confess; however, I do watch such broadcasts, often times with enthusiasm. I do feel that I am capable of evaluating their opinions and comments and contrast them with my own. However, most TV viewers tend to take opinions of reporters as the actual news events How do most people determine their stand on political matters? Do they search for the actual events and the candidate's stand on the event or issue or do they watch those cute 30 second sound bytes, the political campaign ads? I think most people depend on those 30 second campaign ads. Just think about it. The next president of the United States may be selected by the quality of those campaign ads. These campaign ads are often times inaccurate, misleading and highly partisan. In a nutshell that is the basis of our problem. We are the problem. People must take the time, make the time to become informed. They must start to see the world in an objective matter. Ignorance is a problem, but so is apathy and self interest. Most people simply do not care. Or they care only when the situation affects them. Or only when the outcome affects their unique situations. In a democracy each person must be informed, concerned and active. |
|
|
The United Methodist of America just concluded their every four year national meeting in May. Surprisingly they ended their meeting united once again. There was a strong possibility that the Methodist would split over the gay issue. Many Methodist feel that as a denomination of faith they should not allow openly gay people to become members of the clergy. They feel that the Bible explicitly condemns gay behavior proving that they must strongly oppose any doctrine that may suggest that they approve of the lifestyle. Quite unexpectedly they put their divisions aside and opted to remain a united church. Whether the United Methodist stay united is their business, but I do applaud their expression of respect and dignity of all God's children. I think people, including religious groups, should be more concerned about the things that unite us rather than the things that divide us. We should concentrate on our commonality, not our differences. Christians should be Christ like. Jesus Christ preached love. Love accepts all people. Do I have to accept the beliefs of all people? Heavens no! You can see things differently from another person, but you should not love that person any less because of those beliefs. You don't have to be one's best friend or agree with their personal views, but you must value that person's right to be the person they choose to be. I don't think that we have the right to judge other people. I think we must coexist with people. In the end God will ultimately judge each of us according to His law. The same kind of logic can be used to describe "Kerry v. the Catholic Church", so to speak. I believe I have exhausted that subject in May 2004's newsletter. I believe the thing that really upsets me the most is the "holier than thou" attitude prevalent in the world today. No one is perfect. No one has all the answers. Every person has the right to the pursuit of happiness. |
|
|
Tech Talk Social Security is not a tech talk topic, but I thought I'd throw it in here since I'm sure technology is used by the Social Security Administration. How does the Social Security Administration calculate a person's social security payment? According to Dorothy J. Clark in her Social Security column in the Sun-Sentinel, social security award is based on the average of one's highest 35 years of service. In other words, one's highest 35 social security working years are averaged to determine one's award. If one does not have 35 years of contributing to social security, then a "0" is computed in the years up to 35. Word to the wise, don't retire too early. Remember when you were in high school and you got a "0" on that algebra test, it drastically affected your average. The same is true with the social security calculation, a "0" will drastically reduce your monthly payment. The next decision, do I apply for social security at 65 or 66 or 67, whatever is the appropriate age for my date of birth or do I apply early at age 62? If you are going to die young, apply at 62. If you apply at 65 or the appropriate age for full benefits, you must live to the ripe old age of 76 (I believe) to make as much cumulatively, as if you had started drawing social security early at age 62. I believe that I will apply for early benefits at age 62. Actually you file the application before you turn 62. You know the government, it takes awhile to process such claims. Now, let's talk about E-commerce and how you view online business transactions. How safe is online purchases? There are some steps to keep in mind when accessing a web business activity. These pointers are courtesy of the Equifax Credit Watch Newsletter - May 2004.
|
|
View Other
Newsletters |
Owner, Webmaster: James
Stabile |